Windows remains one of the most widely deployed operating systems in enterprise environments. For that reason, defensive teams focus heavily on logging, monitoring, and hardening Windows environments, and offensive teams—red teams, adversary emulation groups, and purple teams—must develop reliable, safe methods to evaluate those defenses.
This guide is intended for readers who want a practical, ethical, and non-actionable introduction to Windows red teaming: objectives, scope and legal considerations, high-level methodology, Windows platform internals you should understand, common techniques framed defensively, detection and mitigation, how to build a safe lab, how to structure engagements and reports, and a roadmap for gaining competence.
Note: The material in this blog is provided for defensive, educational, and ethical purposes only. It is intended to help security professionals, blue teams, system administrators, and students understand Windows internals, how adversaries think, and how to design effective detection and remediation. This blog intentionally omits operational exploit code, step-by-step attack procedures, or any instructions that could be used to carry out unauthorized activity.
Do not use the content to conduct testing against systems for which you do not have explicit, written authorization. Unauthorized access to computer systems is unlawful and unethical. If you require actionable testing or proof-of-concept details for remediation, obtain appropriate written authorization and coordinate with legal/compliance and technical stakeholders before conducting any hands-on testing.
A red team’s job is to emulate realistic adversaries to test people, processes, and technology. Because Windows and Active Directory (AD) frequently form the backbone of corporate identity and resource management, a well-executed Windows red team engagement can reveal gaps in privileged access controls, logging fidelity, lateral movement detection, and incident response readiness.
Benefits of Windows red teaming include:
Before any testing begins, a clear scope and set of objectives are essential. Typical objectives for Windows red teaming include:
A scope should list permitted targets (domains, subnets, systems), time windows, excluded assets (e.g., life-safety systems, production databases), allowed techniques, and escalation rules. Documenting “out of scope” and providing an emergency contact list are mandatory for any responsible engagement.
Red teaming without explicit authorization is illegal and unethical. Before any activity:
Ethical red teaming seeks to improve security while preserving availability and privacy.
A Windows red team engagement typically follows several phases. Below is a conceptual framework—avoid operationalized steps and technical recipes here; instead, focus on intentions and outcomes.
1. Reconnaissance & Information Gathering (Passive): Build an asset of inventory and map identity boundaries using publicly available information. The goal is to understand the organization’s external footprint, identity providers, and high-level architecture.
2. Initial Access (Simulated): Exercise scenarios that realistically emulate how adversaries might gain entry. For many organizations, this includes testing the detection of credential compromise, phishing simulations, or supply-chain vectors—conducted within the agreed ROE.
3. Privilege Escalation & Lateral Movement (Emulation): Emulate the progression from a low-privileged account to privileged accounts by exercising identity-centric techniques. The emphasis is on whether the control environment and detection coverage would reveal such activity.
4. Persistence & Data Access (Business Impact): Assess whether an adversary could maintain access and reach sensitive data or systems, and whether those actions are likely to be detected and mitigated.
5. Exfiltration & Cleanup (Controlled): Demonstrate the potential impact of data access without exfiltrating sensitive content. Work with the client to provide sanitized evidence showing that sensitive resources were reachable.
6. Reporting & Remediation: Deliver prioritized findings, constructive remediation guidance, and verification criteria. Offer to retest after remediation.
At each phase, red teams should emphasize documentation, reproducible evidence (redacted when necessary), and communication with client stakeholders.
Understanding the given Windows concepts can help design tests and interpret telemetry which can help red teamers detect cyberthreats and take action.
1. Windows Authentication and Identity
– Local accounts vs. domain accounts: Understand the differences between accounts managed locally on hosts and those managed by a central directory service.
– Kerberos and NTLM basics (conceptual): Know how identity assertions and ticketing models differ. This helps in understanding where identity-based weaknesses may exist.
– Service accounts and Managed Service Accounts: Understand their purpose and why overly privileged service accounts are risky.
2. Active Directory Fundamentals
– Domain controllers and replication: Recognize AD’s role in identity validation and how replication impacts reachability of accounts and ACLs.
– Group membership and delegation: Be familiar with how group-based permissions and delegated rights can enable privilege escalation if misconfigured.
– Schema, objects, and attributes (conceptual): Know the role of objects (users, groups, computers) and attributes in representing identity and access.
3. Windows Host Internals
– Processes, services, and scheduled tasks: Processes run user code; services often run with elevated privileges. Scheduled tasks and service configurations are common persistence and escalation vectors.
– Registry: The registry stores configuration and persistence artifacts; defenders monitor unusual changes to sensitive keys.
– Event logging: Windows Event Logs and audit settings are primary sources of telemetry; understand the kinds of events that map to authentication, authorization, and administrative actions.
3. File System and Permissions
– NTFS permissions: ACLs control access to files and directories; misapplied permissions can expose sensitive resources.
– Shadow copies and backups: Awareness of where backups are stored helps assess potential exposure.
The above sections are conceptual and framed for detection/mitigation planning; they are essential for constructing realistic test scenarios and for evaluating the sufficiency of monitoring.
1. Identity Abuse
Threats often exploit credentials, tokens, or misconfigurations that allow unauthorized use of identity. Examples to monitor include anomalous authentication behavior, unexpected, privileged account usage, and unusual ticketing activity.
2. Lateral Movement
Adversaries try to move from one host to another to reach higher-value systems. Look for unusual remote connections, abnormal process launches on endpoints, and patterns of access that are inconsistent with established baselines.
3. Privilege Escalation
Attackers attempt to gain higher privileges to control more of the environment. Defenders should place emphasis on monitoring changes to group memberships, service configuration changes, and new scheduled tasks or services created with elevated rights.
4. Persistence Mechanisms
Techniques to maintain access can include configuration artifacts that cause code or scripts to execute after reboots. From a defensive perspective, tracking changes to startup items, scheduled tasks, service registration, and related registry keys is valuable.
5. Credential Harvesting
Adversaries may attempt to collect credentials from memory, caches, or file stores. Detecting sudden large authentication attempts, abnormal use of credentialed accounts, and presence of credential stores in unusual locations are important signals.
6. Evasion and Anti-Forensics
Sophisticated actors try to delete logs or tamper with telemetry. Defenders should monitor for gaps in logging, unexpected restarts of logging agents, or deletions of audit artifacts.
Red teams use a variety of frameworks and utilities to emulate adversary behaviors; defenders use the same knowledge to create telemetry and detection rules. When discussing tools in public materials:
This approach preserves the utility of tool awareness for defenders while avoiding enabling misuse.
Practical learning is essential, but testing should be isolated and authorized. A safe lab environment allows teams to practice without risk to production systems.
Key lab design principles:
Document all lab activities, retain evidence securely, and ensure only authorized personnel access the lab.
A central outcome of red teaming is improving detection. The following is a prioritized list of problems you should collect and monitor:
1. Authentication Anomalies
Unusual origin IPs, failed authentication spikes, and anomalous time-of-day access patterns.
2. Account and Group Changes
Changes to privileged group membership, creation of new service accounts, or delegation modifications.
3. Process and Service Events
Unexpected service creations, process injections, or unusual parent-child process relationships.
4. Network Connections
Lateral RDP/SMB connections that deviate from normal patterns; unexpected outbound connections from servers.
5. File and Registry Changes
New autorun entries, changes to startup locations, and modification of sensitive registry keys.
6. Log Deletion and Agent Tampering
Sudden gaps in logging, agent restarts, or changes to logging configuration.
A useful red team report communicates findings clearly to both technical and executive audiences. Best practices include:
Windows red teaming combines deep Windows expertise, strong ethics, and a focus on improving detection and response—delivering accurate risk insights, defensible evidence, and prioritized remediation that reduces exposure. Prioritizing safety, authorization, and collaboration helps build a more resilient defensive posture.
If you would like hands-on, instructor-led training that focuses on Windows adversary emulation, detection validation, and safe practice, consider exploring training options from reputable providers. Redfox Cybersecurity offers structured courses and specialist services designed for security teams that want to develop measurable defensive capabilities. For teams and individuals seeking a practical, defensively focused course in this space, more details—including course syllabus, enrollment options, and schedules—can be found at Redfox Cybersecurity Academy. To discuss tailored engagements or a purple-team exercise, contact us today.
Redfox Cyber Security Inc.
8 The Green, Ste. A, Dover,
Delaware 19901,
United States.
info@redfoxsec.com
©️2025 Redfox Cyber Security Inc. All rights reserved.
